Click for information about the September 11th Fund

Click for information about the International Fire Fighters Fund

Click for information about the Red Cross

Click for information about the Salvation Army

Click to read Kerry's e-mail message about the 9/11 tragedy

Don't Gut The Clean Air Act

Under severe pressure from major campaign contributors and the utility industry, the Bush Administration is on the verge of administratively neutering a decades-old provision of the Clean Air Act that protects us from the pollution created by the dirtiest power plants.

Twenty-five years ago, the Clean Air Act was updated by Congress to include stricter rules controlling pollution from power plants. However, plants in operation before 1977 were granted an exemption from the stricter controls unless they renovated their operations. But, dozens of utilities have invested billions of dollars in expanding the capacity of their plants without installing up-to-date pollution control devices. And if President Bush has his way, they won't have to. That's because his administration is about to roll back this provision, with the result that old power plants will continue to belch harmful toxics into the air we breathe.

Twenty-five years is long enough for the dirtiest power plants to get a free ride from the Clean Air Act. Tell President Bush not to reward his campaign contributors by rolling back the Clean Air Act and to aggressively enforce the law as it was intended by vigorously prosecuting power plants that upgrade without cleaning up.

To take action on this issue, click here


Release Dioxin Report and Protect Public Health

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is delaying the completion and release of a long-anticipated report on dioxin - with potentially disastrous effects for public health. The term ''dioxin'' refers to a group of highly toxic chemicals that are persistent in the body and the environment. According to the EPA's report, dioxin is linked to cancer as well as other serious health problems, including learning disabilities, immune system suppression, diabetes, endometriosis and infertility.

The EPA has been studying the sources and health effects of dioxin for the last twenty years and is in the final stages of completing the most comprehensive health assessment ever prepared in the agency's history. However, the chemical industry has been working behind the scenes to stall the release of this report. Just like the tobacco industry, the chemical industry does not want the American people to know about the public health risks associated with their product.

Indeed, the chemical industry doesn't want this report released for fear it will implicate the sector in a major public health crisis. Some of the stall tactics used by industry officials include; trying to influence scientific peer review processes, pushing through last minute Congressional riders to appropriations bills to limit EPA funding, filing lawsuits based on procedural grounds in order to tie the report up in long legislative battles, and attacking local and state policies aimed at reducing and eliminating dioxin sources.

It is important to get the results of the study released and begin to set regulations on dioxin because of the scale of the health risk. Indeed, every person's body contains dioxin and the amount of the chemicals in the average American is approaching levels that are known to damage our health.

The vast majority of the American public's exposure to dioxin comes from the food we eat. Dioxin gets into our food supply from the incineration of garbage, medical and hazardous waste, the bleaching of paper, the production and disposal of chlorinated pesticides and plastic (such as PVC polyvinyl chlorine) and other processes that involve chlorine.
When dioxin is released from a smokestack it attaches to dust particles and travels thousands of miles on wind currents. It lands on grasses and agricultural crops which are fed to cows, hogs and chickens. As the animal feeds it also consumes the dioxin, which it then stores in its body. When people drink the cow's milk or eat the chicken, beef or pork, the dioxin stored in the animal's body is transferred to our bodies.

Alternative methods for managing wastes, producing plastics and bleaching paper without chlorine do exist and can be used today without huge economic hardship.
But the majority of dioxin producing companies will not switch to non-dioxin creating processes without being forced to by law. We need for the EPA to finalize and release the Dioxin Reassessment so we can begin the process of setting strong health based regulations on dioxin.

Public health should not be compromised for corporate profit.

To take action on this issue, click here
Thanks!

Protect the Arctic Refuge from Oil Drilling

The tragic events of September 11th have cast all discussions of America's energy policy in a new light. Many of our elected leaders (including President Bush) have said that our country must be less reliant on the flow of oil from unstable areas of the world, and we agree. That's just common sense, but we respectfully -- and strongly -- disagree that the alternative is to exploit our nation's precious wild areas for oil.

As you may know, some in Congress are trying to exploit the public's concern about energy security to push for more oil production on the home front. War profiteering may not be too strong a phrase to apply to these efforts.

This short-sighted opportunism would open several of America's special places - including the pristine wilderness of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge - for oil drilling. This would do nothing to decrease our nation's dependence on oil. In short, it would take us in precisely the
wrong energy direction. The most effective way to achieve greater security is to use less oil, period. That's common sense, too.

Now consider this example: if the government set a 40-mpg standard we would save as much oil as we now import from ALL Persian Gulf states. If we required SUV's, minivans and pickup trucks to achieve the same fuel efficiency standard as cars, we would save 1 million
barrels of oil a day. Such gains could not be achieved overnight, of course, but once achieved, they would continue to produce savings into the future.

Right now, large vested interests are making theirvoices heard in Washington in support of more oil drilling. They are making their case for more taxpayer subsidies for old ways of thinking, and they are fighting against any real gains in fuel efficiency.

We are writing to you today because our voices must be heard, too. Efforts to promote destruction of the Arctic must be stopped. Real energy security must be promoted. Please take a moment to join us in sending a message to Washington. And please, forward this message to your friends and family.

Thank you.
Paul Newman

To take action on this issue, click here


"Bowling for Columbine"

Kerry's latest cause is actually a personal recommendation. Recently, she screened the movie "Bowling for Columbine" and was very moved by it. She encourages everyone to check it out. The following is a synopsis of the movie from their website:

"Bowling for Columbine" is an alternately humourous and horrifying film about the Untied States. It is a film about the state of the Union, about the violent soul of America. Why do 11,000 people die in America each year at the hands of gun violence? The talking heads yelling from every TV camera blame everything from Satan to video games. But are we that much different from many other countries? What sets us apart? How have we become both the master and victim of such enormous amounts of violence? This is not a film about gun control. It is a film about the fearful heart and soul of the United States, and the 280 million Americans lucky enough to have the right to a constitutionally protected Uzi.

"Bowling for Columbine" was the first documentary film accepted into competition at the Cannes Film Festival in 46 years. The Cannes jury unanimously awarded it the 55th Anniversary Prize. From a look at the Columbine High School security camera tapes to the home of Oscar-winning NRA President Charlton Heston, from a young man who makes homemade napalm with The Anarchist's Cookbook to the murder of a six-year-old girl by another six-year-old, "Bowling for Columbine" is a journey through America, and through our past, hoping to discover why our pursuit of happiness is so riddled with violence.


Click to visit the Bowling for Columbine website

Click to visit the "How to Get Involved" section of the website